PROPOSING CUSTOMARY CRIMINAL OFFENCES AS THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE NAGARI CUSTOMARY COURT WITH LEGAL CERTAINTY IN WEST SUMATRA

Albert Tanjung (1), Afnaini Afnaini (2), Rias Wita Suryani (3)
(1) Universitas Nasional Indonesia, Indonesia,
(2) Universitas Nasional Indonesia, Indonesia,
(3) Institut Seni Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to examine and formulate a proposal for future law-making (de lege ferenda) by adding customary criminal offences to the absolute competence of the Nagari Customary Court, in order to strengthen the standing and authority of that court as the judicial customary institution of West Sumatra Province. The proposal is grounded principally in Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code and Government Regulation No. 55 of 2025 on the Procedures and Criteria for Determining the Living Law in Society. The inquiry matters because the existence of the Nagari Customary Court is at present regulated normatively only by West Sumatra Provincial Regulation No. 7 of 2018 on Nagari, shaped by Minangkabau custom and culture as the defining characteristic of the province affirmed in Article 5(c) of Law No. 17 of 2022. Article 15(3) of that Regional Regulation confers a narrow absolute competence limited to the amicable settlement of customary civil matters and the imposition of customary sanctions, without legal certainty as to the scope of matters covered, and no certainty whatsoever as to authority over customary criminal offences. The study employs normative juridical research using statutory, conceptual and historical approaches. It finds that, first, the Nagari Customary Court presently stands as a judicial institution outside the state court structure; second, its relative competence is confined to the territory of the Nagari in which it sits; and third, customary criminal offences may be conferred as its absolute competence by reference to Article 2 of Law No. 1 of 2023 juncto Article 16(1) of Government Regulation No. 55 of 2025.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Anwar, Y., & Mustofa, M. (2022). Restorative justice and the recognition of customary dispute settlement in Indonesian criminal law reform. Sriwijaya Law Review, 6(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.1174.pp254-271

Arizona, Y., Wicaksono, M. T., & Vel, J. (2019). The role of indigeneity NGOs in the legal recognition of adat communities and customary forests in Indonesia. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670243

Baroroh, N., Mujib, M. M., & Iswantoro. (2015). Peradilan desa adat sebagai instrumen integral pembangunan hukum nasional ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, 4(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v4i2.1966

Bedner, A., & van Huis, S. (2008). The return of the native in Indonesian law: Indigenous communities in Indonesian legislation. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 164(2–3), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003655

von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2011). Myths and stereotypes about adat law: A reassessment of Van Vollenhoven in the light of current struggles over adat law in Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 167(2–3), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003588

Bowen, J. R. (2000). Consensus and suspicion: Judicial reasoning and social change in an Indonesian society 1960–1994. Law & Society Review, 34(1), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/3115117

Butt, S. (2018). Judicial reasoning and review in the Indonesian Supreme Court. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 5(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.13

Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2021). Judicial mediation and the resolution of disputes in Indonesia. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 21(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897621

Crouch, M. (2020). The everyday emergency: Between corruption and the rule of law in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 15(S1), S1–S20. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2020.30

Faisal, F., & Rustamaji, M. (2023). The living law in the new Indonesian Criminal Code: Between recognition and legal certainty. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), 705–736. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.68391

Fitzpatrick, D. (2007). Land, custom and the state in post-Suharto Indonesia: A foreign lawyer’s perspective. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 39(55), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2007.10756616

Henley, D., & Davidson, J. S. (2008). In the name of adat: Regional perspectives on reform, tradition, and democracy in Indonesia. Modern Asian Studies, 42(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X07003083

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2023). The living law in the new Indonesian Penal Code: A criminal law perspective. Hasanuddin Law Review, 9(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v9i2.4218

Irianto, S. (2020). Legal pluralism and access to justice for indigenous peoples in Indonesia. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 52(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2020.1834611

Kurniawan, K., & Hakim, L. (2023). Institutionalising customary courts in Indonesia: A comparative study of Aceh and Papua. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2245678. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2245678

Nasution, B. J. (2014). Sejarah perkembangan kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovatif, 8(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22437/inovatif.v8i3.2091

Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., & Said, M. Y. (2021). Normative legal research in Indonesian legal scholarship: Method and reasoning. Jurnal Media Hukum, 28(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v28i1.10346

Nurjaya, I. N. (2020). Is the constitutional recognition of adat law communities in Indonesia meaningful? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 52(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2020.1770491

Prameswari, R. R. S. (2026). Tinjauan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) baru. Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi, 6(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v6i2.1187

Rahmadi, T., & Yusuf, M. (2021). Adat dispute settlement and the state courts in West Sumatra: Competing or complementary forums? Indonesia Law Review, 11(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n2.703

Salim, A. (2021). Shari’a, adat and the state: Legal pluralism in contemporary Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 16(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.14

Saputra, A. (2025). Wajah hukum pidana Indonesia dari masa ke masa: Warisan, perubahan, dan pembaruan. Journal of Business Law Research, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.62872/jblr.v1i1.118

Simarmata, R. (2021). The enforceability of customary land rights in Indonesia. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 22(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3915672

Sirait, M. T. (2022). Recognition of customary territories and the limits of legal reform in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly, 43(6), 1421–1439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2045189

Sulistyanto, A., & Rahmawati, M. (2022). Customary criminal law and the principle of legality in Indonesian penal reform. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 9(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n3.a4

Sumarto, S., & Adnan, M. (2024). Village justice and access to dispute resolution in rural Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(4), e26118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26118

Wahyudi, A. (2024). Legal certainty and the institutional design of customary adjudication in decentralised Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 10(1), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1014

Wignjosoebroto, S. (2019). From colonial legal dualism to national legal unification: The unfinished agenda of Indonesian legal history. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 16(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol16.3.765

Yusriadi, Y. (2021). Living law and the transformation of customary justice in eastern Indonesia. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(7), 1502–1518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909621997386

Zulfa, E. A., & Gunarto, M. P. (2023). Ultimum remedium and the reconstruction of criminal liability in the new Indonesian Penal Code. Jurnal Media Hukum, 30(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v30i2.17255

Authors

Albert Tanjung
albert.tanjunglaw@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Afnaini Afnaini
Rias Wita Suryani
Tanjung, A., Afnaini, A., & Wita Suryani, R. (2026). PROPOSING CUSTOMARY CRIMINAL OFFENCES AS THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF THE NAGARI CUSTOMARY COURT WITH LEGAL CERTAINTY IN WEST SUMATRA. Iustitia Criminal Science, 1(1), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.68374/ics.v1i1.11

Article Details

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.