CORRUPTION ERADICATION IN INDONESIA'S FREE NUTRITIOUS MEALS (MBG) PROGRAMME: RISK MAPPING AND AN INTEGRITY FRAMEWORK

Fitri Wahyuni (1), Asneliwarni Asneliwarni (2), Susi Delmiati (3), Julian Ransangan (4)
(1) Universitas Islam Indragiri Riau, Indonesia,
(2) Institut Sains dan Teknologi Muhammadiyah Tarakan, Indonesia,
(3) Universitas Ekasakti Padang, Indonesia,
(4) Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia

Abstract

This study examines the eradication of corruption within the Free Nutritious Meals (Makan Bergizi Gratis, MBG) programme launched as one of the national government's flagship social policies, and asks how Indonesia's anti-corruption architecture can be adapted to protect a large-scale, decentralised food-procurement scheme from systemic leakage. Employing a normative-juridical method supported by a qualitative case study and documentary analysis of statutory instruments, audit findings, and secondary literature, the research maps the typical corruption vulnerabilities of mass feeding programmes and evaluates the adequacy of existing preventive and repressive mechanisms. The findings indicate that the principal risks are concentrated in vendor selection, price mark-ups, quantity and quality manipulation, and weak beneficiary verification, and that these risks are amplified by the programme's speed of roll-out, its multi-tier disbursement chain, and fragmented oversight. The study concludes that a hybrid strategy combining digital procurement transparency, real-time beneficiary data, strengthened inter-agency coordination, and a recovery-oriented enforcement posture offers the most realistic path to safeguarding public funds without paralysing programme delivery. Its academic contribution lies in extending the doctrine of state financial loss and procurement integrity to a novel welfare context and in proposing an integrity framework that reconciles rapid social-policy implementation with the constitutional imperative of corruption eradication.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Ainsworth, P., & Hardyns, W. (2023). Corruption and public trust in institutions: A systematic review of the evidence. Crime, Law and Social Change, 80(3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10083-0

Aminah, S., & Roikan. (2021). Preventing corruption in public procurement: The role of e-catalogue in Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 6(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v6i2.11713

Assegaf, R. S. (2020). Judicial reform and the fight against corruption in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v10n1.601

Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12033

Butt, S. (2019). Anti-corruption reform in Indonesia: An obituary? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690411

Crouch, M. (2020). The everyday emergency: Between corruption and the rule of law in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 15(S1), S1–S20. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2020.30

de Renzio, P., & Wehner, J. (2017). The impacts of fiscal openness: A review of the evidence. World Bank Research Observer, 32(2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx004

Dewi, G. C., & Prasetyo, T. (2022). Restorative justice and the recovery of state financial losses in corruption cases. Jurnal Media Hukum, 29(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v29i2.13892

Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering high-level corruption: Cross-national objective corruption risk indicators using public procurement data. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000461

Fazekas, M., Tóth, I. J., & King, L. P. (2016). An objective corruption risk index using public procurement data. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9308-z

Fenwick, C., & Lindsey, T. (2021). Public accountability and social assistance programmes in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 38(2), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae38-2c

Ferraz, C., & Finan, F. (2008). Exposing corrupt politicians: The effects of Brazil's publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 703–745. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.703

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048

Hamzah, A., & Nurdin, R. (2020). The concept of state financial loss in Indonesian corruption law. Hasanuddin Law Review, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v6i1.1922

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2019). Corruption and the abuse of power: A criminal law perspective. Mimbar Hukum, 31(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.43915

Juwana, H. (2021). Governance, transparency, and anti-corruption strategy in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 18(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol18.4.812

Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries? World Development, 37(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.07.002

Kristiyanto, E. N. (2020). Preventive strategy in combating corruption within bureaucratic reform. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.189-204

Latif, A., & Ali, M. (2022). Political will and the enforcement of anti-corruption law in developing states. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(2), 421–448. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.55231

Mahfud, M., & Zoelva, H. (2020). Constitutional dimensions of corruption eradication in Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 6(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev623

Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2018). Grappling with the 'real politics' of systemic corruption: Theoretical debates versus 'real-world' functions. Governance, 31(3), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12311

Mochtar, Z. A. (2019). Institutional design and the independence of anti-corruption agencies. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 6(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n3.a1

Niehaus, P., & Sukhtankar, S. (2013). Corruption dynamics: The golden goose effect. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 230–269. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.5.4.230

Nurdin, N., & Suhariyanto, B. (2021). Preventing procurement fraud in government social programmes. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.55-78

Olken, B. A. (2006). Corruption and the costs of redistribution: Micro evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4–5), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.05.004

Olken, B. A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 200–249. https://doi.org/10.1086/517935

Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2012). Corruption in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 479–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110917

Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2019). Getting the basic nature of systemic corruption right: A reply to Marquette and Peiffer. Governance, 32(4), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12403

Prasetyo, T., & Barkatullah, A. H. (2020). Dignified justice as a foundation for corruption law reform. Sriwijaya Law Review, 4(2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol4.Iss2.398.pp176-192

Rahmatian, A. (2021). Transparency and accountability mechanisms in public expenditure. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 66, 100482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100482

Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J. (2004). Local capture: Evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 679–705. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041382120

Reksodiputro, M., & Ali, M. (2020). Criminal policy and the modernisation of anti-corruption enforcement. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v16i1.1032

Rose-Ackerman, S. (2018). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 947–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12963

Setiadi, W., & Arliman, L. (2021). Good governance and the prevention of corruption in regional autonomy. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v12i2.7845

Simanjuntak, R., & Nasution, B. (2022). Procurement integrity and the digitalisation of state spending. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 11(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v11i1.56712

Sumaryono, A., & Faisal, F. (2021). The role of civil society in monitoring social assistance corruption. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 9(2), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i2.21456

Wijayanta, T. (2020). Judicial consistency in the adjudication of corruption cases. Mimbar Hukum, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.49821

Zamroni, M., & Aziz, N. (2022). Preventive and repressive approaches in Indonesian anti-corruption law enforcement. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 30(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v30i1.19872

Authors

Fitri Wahyuni
motherdosen@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Asneliwarni Asneliwarni
Susi Delmiati
Julian Ransangan
Wahyuni, F., Asneliwarni, A., Delmiati, S., & Ransangan, J. (2026). CORRUPTION ERADICATION IN INDONESIA’S FREE NUTRITIOUS MEALS (MBG) PROGRAMME: RISK MAPPING AND AN INTEGRITY FRAMEWORK. Iustitia Criminal Science, 1(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.68374/ics.v1i1.5

Article Details

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.